Fairfax-VA.  The ML 2010-24 is guidance for Combined Loan To Value (CLTV) refinance transactions – only. The new policy and guidelines are more restrictive than the old FHA policies guidelines.  In the past FHA policies did not have a restriction on minimum equity limits (LTV and CLTV in loan talk), but Wall Street and the big banks added their own restrictions that allowed an FHA loan to be underwater by only 25% of the appraised value.  Essentially in the past,  FHA didn’t care how far underwater a borrower was, the loan request was able to be approved if the loan circumstances met FHA guidelines. But the companies that funded FHA loans do care how much equity a homeowner has. In the end,  investors (Wall Street and the big banks) did and do care how far a homeowner is underwater so they set the max at 125% of the home’s value as the limit.  Just as in the past, he who has the gold sets the rules. Wall Street and the big banks have the money and clout, so they set the rules to try and limit their exposure to potentially bad loans which could result in large losses.

An explanation of three different FHA programs is below:

Homeowners are now restricted to a 97.75% LTV (2.25% remaining equity) on rate and term refinance, 85% LTV (15% remaining equity) on cash out refinance and 125% CLTV (underwater by 25%, so ZERO equity) for an FHA streamline refinance.  The refinance for borrowers in negative equity positions (underwater) is only available if the current servicer is willing to give up 10% of the current loan balance and that loan must not be a FHA insured plus many other restrictions.  The LTV limit is 97.75% and the CLTV limit is 115%, you should not get excited about this product since it will be more difficult than getting a short sale approved.  This is based on the ML2010-24: Combined Loan-to-Value Requirements for Refinance Transactions (8/6/10).

Fairfax, VA – The House of Representatives approved the Federal Housing Administration Reform Act.   The purpose of FHAR is to bring stability to the FHA lending program. Currently, FHA loans make up about 30 percent of the loans originated in the US. This is a far cry from early to mid 2000’s when real estate agents frowned on any government loan of any type.
 
The FHAR Act is a two-step process which was designed to shore up the crumbling foundation of FHA’s capital reserve account.  The first step to increasing the reserve account occurred in April of 2010 as the up-front MIP (mortgage insurance premium) premiums collected from the borrower was increased from 1.75 percent to 2.25 percent of the loan amount.  But the bigger plan was for FHA to increase the monthly mortgage insurance premium which is currently .55 percent for purchase loans with less than 5 percent down payment or refinance loans with at least 5 percent equity to .50% for homes or loans with at least 5 percent or more equity.  Under the law passed today, the agency will be allowed to increase its annual premium to 1.55 percent of the unpaid balance of the loan. The change or increase is expected to be a two part process. The first change is expected to increase annual MIP to from .55 percent to between .85 percent and .90 percent, then increase the annual MIP to the full 1.55 percent later in the year.  The thought from FHA and Capital Hill is that the increase in the annual MIP will allow for FHA’s capital reserves to increase, but with less impact to the consumer since the annual MIP is paid over the life of the loan instead of a lump sum addition to the loan amount at the time of closing. But this is incorrect.

The FHA reserves were getting hammered by homes going into foreclosure or just plain scammers at work with straw buyers or however mortgage fraud is perpetrated.  This is fact. What I am not sure is taken into account is the effect of the higher monthly mortgage insurance will have on the home buying public. How can tripling the monthly mortgage insurance have no impact to the consumer or to the nation’s housing market?  I read a Freddie Mac article in the early 1990’s that stated for every .25 percent increase in interest rates 250,000 home buyers are priced out of the market. To show this is not true see the example below. Using a $300,000 loan amount as the example, the numbers don’t look good for home buyers after September 7^th.   This date can change, call me if you have any questions. 

You’ve heard about the Credit Crunch and its tightening effect on lending guidelines in the mortgage industry, but what does it mean to millions of Americans who need student loans to help pay their college tuition?

The student loan market looked pretty bleak during the first quarter of 2008. Not only did the reduced benefits created by the College Cost Reduction and Access Act in 2007 kick in, but for the first time in 40 years, no bonds backed by student loans were purchased during this time. The new bill, which was good news for students, was funded by cutting subsidies to student lenders already feeling the effects of the credit crunch. According to Forbes, this loss of liquidity spooked a lot of investors of the student loan asset-backed securities market, destabilized Sallie Mae, the largest federal student loan provider and servicer, and sent student lenders into turmoil, as at least 50 federal student loan providers scaled back or ended participation in this type of lending.

Since then, Congress has passed legislation and taken other measures to ensure that student loan companies continue to issue federally subsidized student loans. Now, according to the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators (NASFAA), most “traditional” students should have no problem getting federal student loans from the remaining 2,000-plus lenders participating in this market.

For those students forced to seek private or alternate education loans, however, this is a much different story. NASFAA says many students could have trouble getting these types of student loans. Because of this, NASFAA added that private student loans should only be used as a last resort when it comes to paying for college.

Which students are affected?

• Students attending smaller schools and for-profit career or trade colleges, or other institutions that rely heavily on private lenders, will find it more difficult and expensive to gain access to private student loans than they have in the past – especially if they have credit issues.
• Older students, students with poor credit, or those students without a creditworthy co-signer (e.g., mom and dad), are likely to pay higher rates for whatever private student loans they are able to find.
• Students whose college tuition is more than their federal loans provide could also be affected if a) a private loan is necessary to make up the difference or b) the student does not qualify for Federal Perkins or PLUS loans or other types of financial aid programs.
• It’s important to note that financial aid, including Pell Grants, Federal Work Study, and education tax benefits are not affected by the Credit Crunch.

The biggest mistake students and parents can make in these situations is loading up credit cards and taking on expensive private loans to pay for college. Over the course of four or five years, this could really add up and put you or your children in debt for years to come. If you’re a homeowner, however, you may be able to avoid this credit trap by consolidating credit card balances and other debt through a home refinance.

Before you make any major credit decision regarding college tuition, give us a call. We’ll gladly review your finances and help you make the best decision for your specific goals and needs.

Fairfax, Virginia: Although USDA loans are not a big deal in the northern Virginia area, but they are HUGH deal in the outlying counties of Fauquier, Prince William and Loudoun. It was recently been announced that the USDA 100% (zero down) loan program will be out of money by the end of April 2010.  Typically the USDA program has sufficient funds to cover the needs of potential borrowers. But as with many home financing programs, money is in short supply.  As lending guidelines have tightened over the past two years, the ability of a borrower finding a zero down home loan out side of the Veteran Department VA loan has disappeared almost completely.  This is has caused homebuyers that wouldn’t typically consider a USDA loan for financing to not only consider it, but actually apply for and be approved for the USDA zero down home loan. The program has no mortgage insurance, great rates and flexible credit guidelines. So over the last few years, USDA has stepped up to fill the void and provide affordable zero down loans for qualified first time homebuyers across the nation.

Although Fairfax, Virginia doesn’t have many areas that work for the USDA program, the increased demand across the country for USDA loans has led to a shortfall of funds. Last year the stimulus money was used to bridge the funding gap and business went along as usual. The stimulus money helped fill the void the past couple of years, but without additional it is projected that funds for the program will dry up sometime in late April.  When this happens the USDA will stop issuing loan commitments until their normal refunding takes place sometime next fall.  Most economist suspect any slow down in the housing market could have drastic affects on the economy pulling out of the recession.  Many first-time homebuyers could miss the $8,000 tax credit.  The best idea would be to fund the USDA program now so as to try and prevent the economy from slipping back in to a recession.

Below is a list of the members of the committees that can help steer passage of the appropriation request:
United States Senate Committee on Appropriations
Subcommittee on Agriculture
Rural Development
Food and Drug Administration

Democratic Members

• Senator Herb Kohl (Chairman) (WI)
• Senator Mark Pryor (AR)
• Senator Dianne Feinstein (CA)
• Senator Tom Harkin (IA)
• Senator Richard Durbin (IL)
• Senator Byron Dorgan (ND)
• Senator Ben Nelson (NE)
• Senator Jack Reed (RI)
• Senator Arlen Specter (PA)
• Senator Tim Johnson (SD)

Republican Members

• Senator Sam Brownback (Ranking Member) (KS)
• Senator Mitch McConnell (KY)
• Senator Susan Collins (ME)
• Senator Christopher Bond (MO)
• Senator Thad Cochran (MS)
• Senator Robert Bennett (UT)

I always advise my clients to lock in their interest rate at the earliest opportunity. Gambling with a client’s interest rate is never advisable. In my business, I have a standardized system in place that we adhere to for all of our clientele.

A mortgage loan cannot be closed without locking in a rate, and there are three main elements to take into consideration:

• Interest Rate
• Points
• Length of the lock

Locking in on a rate does not obligate the client to commit to the loan until the loan is actually closed. The lock simply eliminates any risk of the borrower being exposed to market volatility. It provides the security of having time to complete the mortgage and real estate transactions with some sense of order. The lender must disburse funds to complete the transaction within the rate-lock period, or else the original commitment to provide a loan at a certain interest rate will expire.

When a lender permits an extended lock-in period, the borrower will usually see either a higher interest rate or more points associated with the loan. The lender does this to minimize their own exposure to market volatility; hence the borrower pays for the lender to take on this risk.

For example, a 30-day rate lock commitment may cost the consumer one-half point, while a 60-day rate lock commitment could cost 1 full point. If the borrower needed an extended lock period, but did not want to pay points, the lender could make up the difference in the interest rate. In this case, typically, a 60-day lock would have a higher interest rate than a 30-day lock.

In my business, our standard procedure is to lock in a rate as quickly as possible once we have received the loan application. My team and I let our clients know that while interest rates fluctuate daily, most lenders do not want to lose any business. We know that in many cases, if there is a significant rally in the market that causes interest rates to drop .25% or more, we can ask the lender to renegotiate the rate. or understand that we will take the loan to another lender. Often the lender allows for a renegotiation of the rate to avoid losing the loan to another lender.

If we allow our clients to sit on the fence and not lock in a rate quickly, we would leave them exposed to market volatility. Then, if rates do increase, the borrower may be unable to qualify for the loan they want, which is a situation we try to avoid at all costs.

By knowing our clients’ needs and working intimately with them to make the right decisions, my team and I are proud to say that we have many clients who are raving fans.

Vienna, Virginia: Fannie Mae has updated its automated underwriting software recently. The changes are major and could affect how many potential home seekers actually become homeowners. Having a loan underwritten by an actual person are almost non-existent these days. Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac feel they are better served using their proprietary software programs.  Desktop Underwriter^® (DU) Version 8.0 has changes to credit score requirements and mortgage insurance coverage will include:

Maximum Debt To Income Ratios (DTI). This is the ratio of how much of your monthly income is being consumed by your monthly debt.

• Maximum DTI lowered to 45%, with flexibilities offered up to 50% (as approved by the software)

Minimum credit score requirement for home buyers in Fairfax, Virginia and Alexandria, Virginia

• Minimum credit score increased from 580 to 620 (excludes Fannie Mae^® DU Refi Plus^TM
• The REfi Plus loan is for homeowners that loans are owned by Fannie Mae (this is different than who you make your payment too) Click below to find out more. Find out if Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac owns your mortgage

High Balance Mortgage Loans over $417,000 to $729,650

• 2009 Temporary high-cost area loan limits will be supported by the new software.
• Eligibility guidelines and Appraisal Field Review requirements have changed

Mortgage Insurance (MI) – Coverage Changes

• Reduced MI and lower cost MI options will be retired for loans underwritten using new software
• With this change, Fannie Mae has introduced a new minimum MI coverage option with associated Loan Level Pricing Adjustments (LLPA’s). These are add-ons Fannie Mae charges for different loan scenarios.

Mortgage Insurance (MI) - Changes to Financed Mortgage Insurance Requirements

• Desktop Underwriter (DU) will be updated to allow financed MI using either a single premium plan that is paid at one time upfront, or a split premium plan that has both an upfront and monthly component

2-Unit owner-occupied interest-only LTV/CLTV changes. Loan To Value and Combined Loan To Value – Essentially state how much equity is in the home. 80% LTV is the same as stating a home has 20% equity for real estate in Fairfax, Virginia and Alexandria, Virginia.  

• Maximum LTV/CLTV reduced from 80/80% to 75/75%

Expanded Approval (EA) are gone!! A paper borrowers are the only ones that will be able to get a loan in the future.

• EA II and III recommendations will no longer be offered by DU 8.0

Fairfax, Virginia: The Treasury Department released guidelines and updated forms on November 30, 2009 for its new Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA) for homeowners in Fairfax, Virginia and Alexandria, Virginia area. The HAFA program is supposed to compliment the HAMP program and applies to loans not owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. The intent of the HAFA program is to assist additional homeowners that are in distress while setting out clear guidelines for mortgage servicers and mortgage holders. The HAFA program also provides incentives to servicers.  The HAFA program is for homeowners in connection with the following situations:

1. A short sale
2. A deed-in-lieu of foreclosure (DIL) used to avoid foreclosure on a loan eligible for modification under the HAMP program.
3. Servicers participating in HAMP are also required to comply with HAFA when working with homeowners in the Fairfax, Virginia and Alexandria, Virginia areas.

The Governments home affordability plan has some new changes for loans not currently serviced by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

Link to HAMP participating servicers: MakingHomeAffordable.gov.

Link to the website: www.hmpadmin.com

Link to the 43 page guidelines that could help homeowners the Fairfax, Virginia and Alexandria, Virginia areas: https://www.hmpadmin.com/portal/docs/hamp_servicer/sd0909.pdf

The supplemental directive 09-09, is effective April 5, 2010, but participating servicers may elect to implement HAFA prior to April 5, 2010, in accordance with the supplemental directive guidelines.

• Program offers eligible homeowners viable alternatives to avoid foreclosure;
• Preventing servicers from attempting to reduce real estate commissions established in the listing agreement as a condition for short sale approval;
• Releasing borrowers from future liability for the debt; and
• Providing financial incentives to borrowers, servicers and investors.
• Provides a viable alternative for homeowners who are HAMP eligible but cannot keep their home.
• Allows the use of financial information and forms already in the system in connection with a loan modification.
• Enables the homeowner to seek pre-approved short sales terms before listing the property.
• Requires borrowers in the Fairfax, Virginia and Alexandria, Virginia areas to be fully released from future liability for the first mortgage debt. At this time I am not sure how this applies release of second mortgages or HELOCs liability. (No cash contribution, promissory note, or deficiency judgment is allowed).
• Provides a standardized time frame and process for handling alternatives;
• Financial incentives:
  • $1,500 for borrower relocation assistance
  • $1,000 for servicers to cover administrative and processing costs
  • Up to $1,000 for investors for allowing a total of up to $3,000 in short sale proceeds to be distributed to subordinate lien holders (on a one-for-three matching basis).

Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has implemented significant changes for streamline refinances . These changes will affect all FHA streamline loans across the country and in the northern Virginia area, Vienna, Virginia, Alexandria, VA, Fairfax and the surrounding cities and county’s. These changes take place on all FHA case numbers ordered on Wednesday, November 18, 2009 or later.

The changes are:

1. New seasoning requirements (length of payment)
2. Payment history standards
3. A net tangible benefit test (The loan has to be good for the borrower, imagine that) 
4. Revised remaining equity (Combined Loan To Value requirements)
5. Elimination of the abbreviated loan application
6. Additional certifications and verifications

1. Changes about length of payment history or what we call loan seasoning:

Seasoning: At the time of loan application, the borrower must have made at least 6 payments on the FHA-insured mortgage being refinanced.

2. Payment History. At the time of loan application, the borrower must exhibit an acceptable payment history as described below.

Less than a 12 month payment history, the borrower must have made all mortgage payments within the month due. 

For borrowers that have a 12 month payment history or greater two points must be present: 
    Experienced no more than one 30 day late payment in the preceding 12 months
    Made all mortgage payments within the month due for the three months prior to the date of loan application.

3. Net Tangible Benefit: Basically, no more refinancing to just to refinance a client to generate fees. This is a good thing. It must be determined that there is a net tangible benefit (actual savings to the borrower) as a result of the Streamline Refinance transaction. Net tangible benefit is defined as follows:

Refinancing a fixed rate loan to a to fixed rate loan or ARM (adjustable rate mortgage loan) to ARM: A minimum 5% reduction in the total mortgage payment.

A fixed rate loan to an ARM loan: The new ARM rate must be at least 2% less than the current Fixed rate loan

ARM to Fixed: The new Fixed rate may not be more than 2% above the current ARM rate

Streamline refinancing to ARMs will be restricted on investment properties and second homes.

4: Have a second mortgage or Home Equity Line Of Credit?

All loan amounts can only addup to 25% more than the value of the property. 

5: Elimination of the abbreviated loan application. A complete loan appliction must be taken to include residence, income, and work history.

6. Certifications and Verifications: 

Must include a signed and dated cover letter certifying that the borrower is employed and has income at the time of loan application. This will be followed up with a phone call prior to closing to verify you are still employed.

Assets: If assets are needed to close, the funds must be verified and documented correctly